<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d13627209\x26blogName\x3dThe+Cynical+Ones\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://thecynicalones.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://thecynicalones.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-4590904552691322950', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
About Me

Writer. Music head. Political junkie. Pop culture whore. Funny black boy. Looking to have a voice in the world -- with a few good sponsors.

View My Complete Profile


Find Me Here:

The Recession Diaries

The Spin

Stay Tuned

Twitter


The Roll

1016

Aliya King

All That I Am: A Diary of My Randymethoughts Pt. II

Amerika's Muse

Bark + Bite

Basement Elevation

Bomani Jones

Bossip

Brooklyn Sista

Clay Cane

Concrete Loop

crunk and disorderly

Dope Penmanship

Fly Cliches

Four Four

GangStarrGirl

Got Sole?

Hot 2 Def Inc.

Incommunicado

Just Another Girl on the IRT

Me, Myself An Eye

Middlechild Promotions

Mz. Virgo

Necole Bitchie

Negrita Linda

One Boy Revolution

Oo Itz Santo

Queen of the Non Sequiturs

Queen To Be

Rhymes With Snitch

Soulbounce

Straight From The A

Thank God I'm Famous

That Grape Juice

The Fury

The Real 7

The search for RELLevance

Think2wice

Toya's World



Previous Posts

Lip Porn
She Grown, Ya'll
Always Depressing. Always
Stick and Move
I Still Love You
The Lamb Cometh
New Amerykah
Discipline
Coming To A Public Access Station Near You
My Dougie

archives

May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009


Add to Technorati Favorites

Site Meter

free page hit
counter

Tuesday, March 04, 2008
1:16 PM


The Politics of Good Looks

 

In most articles dissecting America’s fascination with Barack Obama, most writers point to Obama’s hopeful rhetoric as the most alluring aspect to his appeal. They say the country has grown weary of its decisive political culture, and that the slender man with the unique name and even more atypical background offers Americans just what they need: something fresh and different. But are people not mentioning another strong factor of his appeal in an effort to maintain political correctness?

In an interview with Rolling Stone, Mos Def shared his view on America’s fascination with Barack Obama. He told the magazine that Obama’s appeal points to America’s sense of vanity. He told Anthony DeCurtis: “It’s the A & R guy in me . . . when I saw him on the cover of Men’s Vogue, I said, 'This guy’s gonna win because he looks good.’ So, the best-looking guy for the job is a black guy. I’m cool with that. People also want a rock-star quality to the president, which he has.”

He may not be the best source for political commentary to most people (for good reason, in some respects), but he’s only pointing out the obvious. Most people don’t like to admit it, but how you present yourself is a factor -- particularly in a society obsessed with appearance.

Shortly after announcing his intentions to seek the Democratic presidential nomination, many began to publicly suggest that Bill Richardson was too fat to run for president. Though he never addressed this criticism directly, Richardson’s campaign was largely ignored by the media and the general public. That’s an interesting turn of events considering one of the major themes of this campaign has been centered on experience and the issue over who has it and who doesn’t.

Hillary Clinton’s been long touting her experience on the campaign trail, boasting that her experience has left her tested and ready to deal with our country’s greatest crisis. But when tested on that claim by a reporter from Slate on a conference call, her top advisers sounded stumped. They were asked what foreign policy moment could they point to where Hillary has been tested in a crisis. After a couple of moments of silence, an answer finally came, though it was unrelated to the question.

The truth is while she can lay claims to her “35 years of experience,” her experience in government is relatively thin. She has no executive experience, no cabinet experience, and quiet as its been kept in this race, if you factor in Barack Obama’s time as a state legislator, she doesn’t hold as much experience as an elected a official than the candidate she’s sought to marginalize as too inexperience to serve as president.

Out of all of the candidates who dropped their hat in for the race to be the Democratic nominee, the candidates with the most experience were the ones who exited the race the fastest. Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson all have more experience than Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Out of all of the candidates, Bill Richardson was arguably the most qualified.

But, Bill Richardson looks like Fred Flinstone, and unfortunately for him, subconsciously that’s a yabba dabba don’t to many voters.

Another tone-setting theme of this election has been the issue of change. It’s a word that’s typically thrown around in any election, but no one has galvanized such a large movement based on it in recent memory than Barack Obama. His change is based on altering the tone of our political climate, not necessarily a dramatic shift in any significant government policies. He may offer a difference in language and fellowship in public politics, but the majority of his policies mirror Hillary Clinton’s. While Obama can argue that he is more likely to have his policies passed in Congress because of his change in tone, he can’t say that he offers much difference from Hillary Clinton on paper.

Out of all the Democratic candidates, Dennis Kucinich offered the most ‘change’ in terms of policies. Kucinich was the only candidate in favor of a single-payer, not for profit universal health care plan which by and large would cover more Americans than either of the other candidates’ health care plans -- at a much lower cost. Kucinich is the most advocate candidate to call for the repeal of the Patriot Act completely, he is in favor of gay marriage, and is for a complete troop withdrawal from Iraq. Unlike most of the candidates who cater to the center, Kucinich has offered very little ambiguous language in terms of his policies.

But Dennis Kucinich looks like Jiminy Cricket, and that made his chances far too short to top the ballot.

Even on the Republican side, before his campaign went down in flames, Mitt Romney was lauded for his ‘good looks.’ Though he was very much a centrist as governor of Massachusetts, he somehow managed to mold himself as the conservative alternative to John McCain. His downfall was his religion, but had he been a Methodist or a Baptist, would he be the one likely to secure the Republican nomination tonight?

To say Barack Obama’s main appeal lies in his smile trivializes the impressive grassroots organization has campaign has built, and negates the real change (however the persuasion) that many Americans long for. But, for a presidential campaign where change and experience have made the deciding factors in who gets the nomination, is it far to ask where would Richardson and Kucinich be if they were as aesthetically pleasing to voters as the two candidates left in the race?

Labels:


The Cynical Ones.
posted by Michael at